Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Tim Krabbe and chess again
And I have managed not to lose to Charles after 49 half-moves, which is such an achievement that even if I chuck it all away (already managed to be a pawn and the exchange down!) it's worth noting. And it has been a more interesting game than the ones in which I lose material in the first 10 moves - both of us have had to do some head-scratching.
1. e4 c5
2. d4 cxd4
3. c3 dxc3
4. Nxc3 Nc6
5. Nf3 e6
6. Bc4 a6
7. Qe2 d6
8. 0-0 Qc7
9. Rd1 Be7
10. Bf4 Nf6
11. Rac1 0-0
12. e5?! dxe5
13. Nxe5 Nxe5?! (here, 13. ...Bd6 would have led to a quick win for Black)
14. Bxe5 Qa5
15. Rd4 b5
16. Bd3 b4
17. Rh4 g6 (getting quite fun now!)
18. Nd1 Bb7
19. Rc7 Qd5
20. f4 Rfd8
21. Bc2 Rd7
22. Ne3 Qxa2 (it's great the way that threats and counter-threats are building up...)
23. Rxb7 Rxb7
24. Qf3 Qa1+
25. Kf2 Raa7
26. hmm...
It could all go pear-shaped given how many pieces down I am and how loose the whole position it, but it's been fun while it lasted....
Jonah
(1) In Jonah 2 we have a 'psalm', sung at some point during the three days&nights Jonah was in the fish - perhaps even right before he was spat out, as the transition between verses 10 and 11 allows if not implies. It bears comparison with Psalm 18 (of David), another Psalm of deliverance.
In David's Psalm the distress of being surrounded and hounded by human enemies is compared to th experience of [drowning] in deep waters (verse 16). Look at the descriptions of God's salvation, however... In David's Psalm they are rich metaphors, full of drama, requiring a whole digital studio for rendering them in convincing CGI (flying on cherubim, fire, coals, laying bare the seabed, reaching down from heaven, blasts of breath, etc) - in Jonah's Psalm they are almost absent. Instead we have the thoroughly prosaic notes in 1:17 and 2:11 regarding a fish gulping the prophet down and later vomiting him onto dry land. Jonah is definitely mocking Jonah here. Is it an angel, is a divine flame? No, it's a floating stomach.
(2) As pointed out to me on Sunday, when it comes to Jonah in the New Testament we have some awkward corners. What is "the sign of Jonah"? And why is Peter called Simon, son of John in John 1:42 but Simon, son of Jonah in Matthew 16:17.
I wonder whether it's something to do with the sign of Jonah itself. If the sign of Jonah includes in it the idea that repentant Gentiles will receive mercy denied to faithless Jews, then Jesus calling Peter 'son of Jonah' in Matthew 16 is a hint at his future ministry to Gentiles (which was not numerically significant compared to Paul's, but he was the apostle who welcomed Cornelius into the church). In other words, his Dad was called John.
hopecommunitychurch
The school we are meeting in (weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9...) is 2 minutes from our house (woohoo!) and the chapel we are meeting in (weeks 2, 4, 6, 8...) is where Spurgeon preached his first sermon (nice).
Soon we may even have our own website, and then we'll truly have arrived ;-)
Thursday, 16 August 2007
and again
1. P76 P34
2. P75 P44
3. P36 R42
4. R78 R72
5. S68 S62
6. K48 S32
7. K38 S33
8. S48 G(6)52
9. S77 P84
10. S86 G32
11. S95 P85
12. P74!? the sleeve is extended recklessly
12. … Px74
13. B55 S73
14. S84 S82
15. S83+ Sx83
16. Bx91+ N73
17. +B81 R62
18. +B71 P14 (not wanting the draw after …R92)
19. +Bx62ch. Kx62
20. S33 G31
21. L’76 S’72
22. Lx74 S42
23. G(4)58 P45
24. Lx73+ch. Sx73
25. N’66 B’92 (very much on the defensive now…)
26. N77 S(7)84
27. N65 P64
28. R’91 P’33
29. Nx33+ch. Sx33
30. P’74 S(7)84
31. Rx92+ch. Sx92
32. B’73ch. Sx73 (white must accept the double major piece sacrifice)
33. Px73+ch. K51
34. +P82 L’61
35. +Px92 P35
36. Px35 R’89
37. P’79 P65 (desperately probing for weaknesses…)
38. R71+ N’25
39. S’72 K41
40. Sx61= G51
41. L’52 Px65
42. Lx51+ch. Sx51
43. S24 Px67+
44. Gx67 R88+ch.
45. G78 (this is almost impregnable, Gold on pawn)
45. … P’37ch.
46. Nx37 Nx37+ch.
47. Sx37 +R89
Shogi at last!
This afternoon, as Black, I beat the computer on 1-kyu!
1 | P76 | P34 | 31 | +Px63 | Rx76 |
2 | P75 | K42 | 32 | +Px52 | N3x47+ch. |
3 | R68 | G652 | 33 | Sx47 | R79+ |
4 | K48 | Bx88+ | 34 | +Px42ch. | Gx42 |
5 | Sx88 | K32 | 35 | G’69 | G’79ch. |
6 | P74 | N65 | 36 | K58 | Nx47+ch. |
7 | S48 | P’76 | 37 | Kx47 | +Rx99 |
8 | Px73+ | Nx73 | 38 | L’79 | S’59 |
9 | P74 | N65 | 39 | Gx59 | Gx59 |
10 | S48 | P’76 | 40 | R78 | L’44ch. |
11 | P65 | P77 | 41 | K56 | G’45ch. |
12 | Nx77 | Nx77+ | 42 | K65 | P’64ch. |
13 | Sx77 | R72 | 43 | Kx64 | G69 |
14 | S86 | N25 | 44 | R72+ | +Rx79 |
15 | N’73 | B’76 | 45 | P’75 | P’63ch. |
16 | G78 | Bx49+ | 46 | Kx63 | +R68 |
17 | Kx49 | R71 | 47 | B’77 | +Rx77 |
18 | K38 | S42 | 48 | Sx77 | B’54ch. |
19 | P26 | Sx73 | 49 | K73 | Bx72 |
20 | Px73+ | N’35 | 50 | Kx72 | P’71ch. |
21 | Px25 | N’26ch. | 51 | Kx71 | R’67 |
22 | K49 | G’38 | 52 | R’72 | L’52 |
23 | K58 | Gx48ch. | 53 | N’64 | Rx57+ |
24 | Kx48 | S’38 | 54 | Nx52+ | K33 |
25 | S’36 | Sx29+ | 55 | +Nx42 | P25 |
26 | P24 | Px24 | 56 | Px25 | +Rx77 |
27 | P’27 | +Sx19 | 57 | G’24 | K22 |
28 | Px26 | L’76 | 58 | S’23 | 1-0 |
29 | G67 | N’55 | 59 | | |
30 | Gx76 | +S29 | 60 | | |
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
Somewhat more encouraging reversals
Walls continues with a further pertinent observation…
‘Nevertheless, now, when the
Strange reversals
Speaking of the expansion of the Muslim Fulani Empire, the destruction of the Old Oyo Empire that led to the Yoruba wars, and the subsequent influx of Egba people into the coastal regions of Nigeria in the early 19th century, Ajayi contends that ‘[i]ndirectly therefore the last advance that Islam made to the south prepared the way for the advance inland of the influences of Christian Europe.’
[J. F. Ade Ajayi, Christian missions in
Meanwhile…
‘Curiously enough, under the
[Andrew F. Walls, ‘British Missions’, in Missionary ideologies in the imperialist era, 1880-1920, eds Torben Christensen and William R. Hutchison (Århus, Denmark: Aros, 1982), pp. 159-65, p. 165].
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
under the aforementioned inspiration of Dave Gorman
Strictly speaking, according to the criteria used on DG's hilarious bet, it's not valid, because neither word appears in the dictionary used by google. But the poverty of that dictionary need not stand in my way. Each word is in current use and may be found on thousands of websites relating to Christian eschatology or music theory. So there. I don't care if the official googlewhack website doesn't agree with me - I demand my moment of satisfaction!
to explain that name...
Monday, 13 August 2007
Prof Richard Bras
To the first question (is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar?) Jesus gives a 'proper' response, which is to say that he accepts the question as valid and uses it as a springboard for a cutting response about covenant fidelity to YHWH. After all, YHWH's image is much more prominent and important than any mere Caesar's is!
To the second, from the Saducees, he takes an 'orthodox' Jewish line, as it were. The response is just plain rude - no fancy work. Direct and to the point.
The third - well, look at that one yourself...
God means business: Obadiah then and now (2)
In verse 15 Obadiah's prophecy takes on a grander flavour...
The day of the LORD
* is near
* is for all nations
* involves perfectly fair justice
* you need to be on Mount Zion to be safe then
* God will rule
The fourth point was the longest - it involved a test case of OT prophetic interpretation, following David Field's lead, putting Obadiah in the context of apostolic usage of Amos 9 (which Obadiah expands on) and Joel 2 (which quotes Obadiah regarding deliverance on Mount Zion). This leads us to see the fulfilment of these prophecies (including those regarding land) in Christ and in the renewal of Israel by the incorporating of Gentiles through the mission of the church.
Some technical hitches (!) and I have now lost my voice, which does not bode well for a talk I have to deliver tomorrow, but I am grateful to God for getting me through my first OT 'mini-series' in a way which was helpful to me and to at least some of the listeners.
Need to think more about specific works that help us to find Christ in the Old Testament, as it were, as a good question by Al revealed... He recommended Motyer, Look to the Rock, which I ought to get hold of ASAP.
Saturday, 11 August 2007
chess and childishness
Best of all so far to my infantile tastes are the King's Gambit adventures of Finnish GM Heikki Westerinen (and I shouldn't say it, as it's rather patronising, but I so love Finnish names!) who certainly doesn't worry about material, king position or being in any way sensible as he blazes around the board having a lot of fun. I wasn't brave enough to play 3. Nc3 or Bc4 in real games (following the advice of Joe Gallagher, I always played 3. Nf3), but it's nice to find someone post-1900 who is. This one is very nice indeed.
I also like his sartorial style (see the bottom of the profiles page...)
Friday, 10 August 2007
a whole new world
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
Sons of Korah
On the Psalms SoK have this to say...
They are the supreme biblical portrayal of the spiritual life in all its facets and dynamics. They speak powerfully to a postmodern world that is generally more interested in what the biblical faith looks like from the inside than its abstract doctrinal expression. And for the church today the psalms present a compelling challenge to the often one-dimensional and romanticized spirituality that we find it so hard to move beyond. The psalms portray a rich, multifaceted and real spirituality. They speak powerfully to those who are well acquainted both with the sting of a cursed world and the sweetness of God’s love and grace in Jesus Christ. The psalms were originally written as songs and they were intended to be used. They have a role in the spiritual life and they perform this role as songs. The best way to meditate on God’s word is to use music and indeed this was one of dominant original purposes of the psalms.
Much of the time their songs are only Psalm portions - but that's a lot better than no Psalms at all. Sadly they are not great for congregational singing, either - but it's this kind of work that should help to bring the Psalms back into Protestant worship and into evangelical services. I hope and pray that their music develops and that they inspire others to take this further... Meanwhile, the devotional potential of really getting into this stuff is huge.
under the inspiration of Dave Gorman
Monday, 6 August 2007
in the post today...
Faculty of the Social Sciences
It is hereby certified that
James Michael Williams
was awarded the
Diploma
in Management
on the sixth day of July 2007
Robert Burgess
(Vice-Chancellor)
Unidentifiable
(Registrar and Secretary)
Who would have thought it!? (I had quite forgotten about it, given that I completed the work last September...) Still, I do feel quite chuffed.
"Boris Johnson would destroy London's unity"
God means business: Obadiah then and now (1)
All this was a preamble to Obadiah 1-14...
* Judgement is real, coming, and terrible (1-6)
* Trust in God (3-9)
* Love your neighbour (10-14)
Since the Edomites were destroyed as predicted, we know that God means business. He will exalt his people even as they humble themselves and are humiliated by enemies (including enemies who really should know better).
Christ himself came to live the full life of obedience - loving God and neighbour - and by his power we too can escape being Edomites and live as true Israelites.
With thanks to DF for making his fabulous study guide on Obadiah available online. A mine of useful information and rich suggestions for those wishing to preach from the shortest book in the Old Testament!
in search of a title
The music is decided already, though - works in the style of (or in deep homage to) other composers...
Debussy [Czerny], Dr Gradus ad Parnassum and No. 1 (pour les 'cinq doigts') from the Douze Etudes.
Grieg [Gade], Lyric Pieces, Op. 57, No. 2, 'Gade'.
Howells [Finzi], 'Finzi's Rest' from Howells' Clavicord.
Schumann, 'Chopin' and 'Paganini' from Carnaval, Op. 9.
Barber [Field], Nocturne, Op. 33.
Ravel [Borodin], A la maniere de Borodine: Valse
PDQ Bach [you name it], Prelude and Fugues from The Short-Tempered Clavier.
Samuel Barber Op Posth
People of the Book? Kind of...
John Barton, People of the Book? The Authority of the Bible in Christianity, 2nd edn (London: SPCK, 1993) has very little time for the likes of me! (Well... not quite true, as his tone is often gracious, and he sometimes even compliments 'fundamentalists' for their piety.) He is very concerned to undermine modern biblicism, and in this second edition also to bring out a constructive alternative. There are good things to plunder is this book - it is very erudite, eloquent and insightful - but overall I think he's wrong. Most of the time he falls for the fallacy of the excluded middle, but he is also fond of stating things as if they were arguments in favour of his position, when in fact they are not...
The arrival of Jesus, and of the new work God accomplished through him, draws its significance from the knowledge of God that already existed in Israel, and would be meaningless without it. (33)
Anyone would think, from the number of times Barton makes this claim in the early chapters of the work, Barton that he imagined it is a special insight of his own. But the ‘fundamentalists’ he criticises would say exactly the same thing. It is possible that there are some Dispensationalists, somewhere in
Bizarrely, Barton frequently couples it with a very strong anti-supersecessionist assertion. On page 33, he continues, Jesus’ God is the God of Israel, and that means not only of ancient
Now, whether or not there is any continuing significance to Judaism and precisely what that significance is is hardly an uncontroversial point among those Barton labels ‘fundamentalists’ (of course it has historical, personal, sociological and cultural significance - the question is of its theological status). It would seem to me, however, that a strong case can be made that modern Judaism is essentially a creation of anti-Christian rabbis, and bears very little resemblance to Barton’s ‘God of Israel’. If we want to get all ethnic about it, then the first followers of Jesus (later, ‘Christians’) were all Jews, and many theologians have convincingly argued that ‘the church’ is true
As regards Barton’s central thesis, the falsity of a ‘ fundamentalism that comes closest to adopting in Christianity theory of scripture like the majority Islamic view of the Qur'an – supernaturally inspired in origin, inerrant in content, oracular in function’ (1), I shall doubtless have more to say in future posts.
Note: for a taster on the typology of Jesus as Israel, see this post. And especially note who Leithart is dependent on: the Anglican theologian Austin Farrer, John Barton's old tutor and hero! Perhaps this is too obscure to be irony, but...
Sunday, 5 August 2007
Hidden Treasure (from 20th July)
Nicholas Britton (b.1979) Piano Sonata: a piece in two movements
The first movement of this work, written when the composer was just 17, recalls sonata form (exposition-development-recapitulation), the mainstay of art music from Haydn to Brahms and beyond. The distant, non-committal first theme is replaced by a second, cool and aloof. The middle section erupts into Bacchic revelry – but all the music ideas in this tightly-knit work are based on those of the exposition, including those of the coda, which comes to a weary resting point. The second movement is a rondo (ABACAD…) woven from the same tension between energy and resignation. In the light of this, it is up to each individual listener to interpret the ambiguous ending, which descends from E to E through a series of perfect fourths.
Samuel Coleridge-Taylor (1875-1912) Three-Fours (Valse Suite), Op. 71, Nos 1, 5 & 3
His songs and smaller instrumental works were all the rage in the early part of the century, but all went quiet until Classic FM rediscovered and popularised Coleridge-Taylor’s violin concerto a few years ago. His father, from
Mark Roberts (b.1990) Dreaming
This is tonight’s second work by a 17-year old composer. Mark is a student at Hills Rd VI Form College in
Herbert Howells (1892-1983) Howells’ Clavichord
Between 1941 and 1961 Howells wrote two large books of pieces ‘for clavichord or piano’, each one dedicated to a different musical friend and all in the style of the English keyboard anthologies of the Elizabethan Age. Although
Eric Coates (1886-1957)
This is simple, unpretentious light music at its best, and it is unmistakeably English. It was composed in 1933 by the man best known for his “Dambusters” March, who, like Coleridge-Taylor, was the son of a doctor. The opening Tarantella (
R. Caroline Bosanquet (b.1940) Suite for Piano 2006
Caroline Bosanquet, who hails from
Dorothy Pilling (1910?-2000?) Vignettes
A former student of the composer at the Royal School of Music in
Edmund Bloxam (b.1983) Melodien 1
The composer writes… Melody is something that dominates all of music. This piece is some reflections upon what melody actually is. It shifts in and out of focus through a variety of means, sometimes through spacing in time, sometimes spacing in harmony, sometimes simply space. Its final appearance, now as a complete entity, acts like an ‘Ode to Joy’, but finds its own simplicity and closed position in time like a restrictive jacket, so it aggressively throws it off and embraces multifarious sound. Edmund is finishing a Masters degree in Composition at
Edward Elgar (1857-1934) In Smyrna & Skizze
These are rare pianistic gems from a composer much better known for his bombastic marches and sumptuous orchestral writing. Skizze was published in 1903 in an obscure German periodical, dedicated to a great champion of Elgar’s music on the continent, Professor Julius Buths. Never standing still, it is a perfectly formed miniature, sharing the advanced harmonic language of Elgar’s largest work, The Apostles, which was completed in the same year. In Smyrna followed in 1905, inspired by a visit to a Turkish mosque made during an intoxicating Mediterranean cruise. Although coloured by ‘oriental’ touches, it is unmistakeably the product of Edwardian England.
Richard Addinsell (1904-1977)
The film Dangerous Moonlight, about a Polish pianist/pilot who joins the RAF during the Second World War, was a patriotic romance that suited the needs and mood of audiences of 1941. The centrepiece of its score has stood the test of time rather more successfully. Its enduring popularity lies in the fundamental quality of the material such that it transcends mere pastiche. It actually feels more Russian than Polish – Rachmaninov, not Chopin – but I’m not complaining as it’s a joy to perform. The arrangement for solo piano (from the original piano/orchestral version) is by Henry Geehl and dates from 1942, by which time the work was so popular that it had been released in nine instrumental versions, including organ and piano accordion. Hmm…